The Performance of Expert Valuation Witnesses in Australia

Author/s: Neil Crosby, Diana Kincaid, John Murdoch

Date Published: 1/01/2001

Published in: Volume 7 - 2001 Issue 2 (pages 89 - 103)

Abstract

Earlier research in the UK found that the performance of expert valuation witnesses was inconsistent. This paper aims to examine the organisation, training and performance of the expert valuation witness in Australia. After reviewing the legal context, the paper examines the criticisms that have been made of expert witnesses and carries out survey work of expert valuation witnesses in Australia, using a comparable survey instrument to that used earlier in the UK. The paper concludes that the current expert witness system is operating reasonably well in Australia, but that more formal training may help to overcome potential bias.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2001.11104097.pdf 14445921.2001.11104097.pdf (1MB)

Keywords

Australia - Expert Witnesses - Performance and Training - Role

References

  • API (2000). Professional Practice 2000. Australian Property Institute. Deakin ACT.
  • ACP (1998). Roles and Duties of un Expert Witness in Litigation. Australian Council of Professions.
  • ALRC (1999a). Experts (Background Paper 6). Australian Law Reform Commission.
  • ALRC (1999b). Review of the federal civil justice system (Discussion Paper 62). Australian Law Reform Commission.
  • ALRC (1999c). Managing Justice - a review of the federal civil justice system (ALRC 89). Australian Law Reform Commission.
  • Callinan I. (1988). The expert witness. The Valuer 30(4) 177-182.
  • Chesterman R.(1998). Dealing with expert witnesses. Law Society Journal 36(10) 50-54.
  • Crosby, N., Lavers, A. and Murdoch, J. (1998a). Property Valuation Variation and the “Margin of Error” in the UK. Journal of Property Research, 15(4) 305-330.
  • Crosby, N., Lavers, A. and Murdoch, J. (1998b). Property Valuation Variation and the “Margin of Error”. Paper at the 4th Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, Perth, January.
  • Crosby, N., Lavers, A. and Murdoch, J. ( 1999). The Role and Performance of the Expert Valuation Witness. Paper at the RICS “Cutting Edge” Conference 1999, http://www.rics.org.uk/researchy.
  • Crosby, N. (2000). Valuation Accuracy, Variation and Bias in the Context of Standards and Expectations. Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 18(2) 130-61.
  • Davison, R. (1988). Arbitration — the Role of the Expert Witness. The Valuer 30(4).
  • De Fina, A. (1998). Australian Council of Professions: Guidelines for Expert Witnesses. Building and Construction Law 14(6) 460-462.
  • Federal Court of Australia (1998). Practice Direction. Guidelines for Expert Witnesses.
  • Freckelton, I., Reddy, P. and Selby, H. (1999). Australian Judicial Perspectives on Expert Evidence: an Empirical Study (Australian Institute of Judicial Administration).
  • Freckelton, I. and Selby, H. The Law of Expert Evidence, LBC. (looseleaf service).
  • Madden, B. (2000) Changes to the Role of Expert Witnesses. Law Society Journal 38(5) 50-52
  • Newell, G. and Kishore, R. (1998). The Accuracy of Commercial Property Valuations. 4th PRRES Conference, Perth, January.
  • Parker, D. (1998). Valuation Accuracy — An Australian Perspective. 4th PRRES Conference, Perth, January.
  • RTCS (1997). Surveyors Acting as Expert Witnesses: Practice Statement and Guidance Notes. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, London.
  • Shank, J. (1983). Hearsay and the Valuer as an Expert Witness. The Valuer 27, 613-614.
  • Western Australia Law Reform Commission (2000). Reform of the Criminal and Civil Justice System.
  • Woolf, (1995). Chapter 23: Experts in Access to Justice: Interim Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Civil Justice System in England and Wales. HMSO, London.
  • Woolf, (1996). Chapter 13: Expert Evidence in Access to Justice: Final Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Civil Justice System in England and Wales. HMSO, London.