The influence of rapid rail systems on office values: A case study on South Africa

Author/s: Douw G. B. Boshoff

Date Published: 2/09/2017

Published in: Volume 23 - 2017 Issue 3 (pages 267 - 302)

Abstract

This study identifies the influence of rapid rail systems on property values, with a focus on office buildings in South Africa. It is based on a limited sample of office properties, analysed using MRA to investigate pre-implementation values and rent to post-implementation data. It attempts to confirm if distance from the train stations influences these variables. Evidence is found that distance from the station does have a positive impact on rental levels and property values. The limited data-set, however, causes inadequate levels of statistical significance in some variables, arguably due to the small sample or model specification error due to information availability for research. The positive influence of rapid rail systems found on office values has important implications for property investors, developers, financiers and taxing authorities. This is important amidst a period of extension planning, whereby this research could provide useful information for decision-making and analysis and offers a valuable contribution to the methods to measure the impact of rapid rail systems on property values, although currently limited to office buildings. Furthermore, this research is contributing to the body of knowledge, especially in developing markets, where advanced public transport systems need to be implemented for the first time.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2017.1375620.pdf 14445921.2017.1375620.pdf (2MB)

Keywords

Gautrain - Multiple Regression Analysis - Property Values - Rapid Rail Systems - Urban Development

References

  • AtisReal, the Bartlett School of Planning and the Symonds Group. (2002) Land value and public transport – a review of the evidence – stage 1, Report for the RICS and ODPM. (November-2002). Retrieved fromReport for the RICS and ODPM. Retrieved from http://www.rics.org/resources/research/land2.html
  • Bae, C. H. C.Jun, M. J.Park, H. (2003) The impact of Seoul’s subway Line 5 on residential property values, Transport Policy. 10, p:85-94. Transport Policy.
  • Banister, D.Thurstain-Goodwin, M. (2011) Quantification of the non-transport benefits resulting from rail investment, Journal of Transport Geography. 19, p:212-223. Journal of Transport Geography.
  • Boarnet, M. G. (2007) Conducting impact evaluations in urban transport, World Bank, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management, Thematic Group on Poverty Analysis, Monitoring and Impact Evaluation. pp.Series (5). World Bank, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management, Thematic Group on Poverty Analysis, Monitoring and Impact Evaluation.
  • Bowes, D. R.Ihlanfeldt, K. R. (2001) Identifying the impacts of rail transit stations on residential property values, Journal of Urban Economics. 50(1), p:1-25. Journal of Urban Economics.
  • Cervero, R.Duncan, M. (2002) Transit’s value-added effects: Light and commuter rail services and commercial land values. Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 1805, p:8-15. Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
  • Colin Buchanan and Partners. (2003) Economic and regeneration impact of tramlink, Report for the South London Partnership, Funded by the London Development Agency, Transport for London and the London Boroughs of Croydon and Sutton. London: (July-2003)Wit press. Report for the South London Partnership, Funded by the London Development Agency, Transport for London and the London Boroughs of Croydon and Sutton.
  • Debrezion, G.Pels, E.Rietveld, P. (2011) The impact of rail transport on real estate prices: An empirical analysis of the Dutch housing market, Urban Studies. 48, p:997-1015. Urban Studies.
  • Doherty, M. (2004) Funding public transport development through land value capture programs, Institute for Sustainable Futures.Institute for Sustainable Futures.
  • Enoch, M.Potter, S.Ison, S. (2005) A strategic approach to financing public transport through property values, Public Money and Management. 25, p:147-154. Public Money and Management.
  • Freeman, A. M. (1979) The hedonic price approach to measuring demand for neighborhood characteristics, The economics of neighborhood. New York: In (Ed.), –p:191-217. Academic Press. The economics of neighborhood.
  • Geurs, K.Haaijer, R.Van Wee, B. (2006) Option value of public transport: Methodology for measurement and case study for regional rail links in the Netherlands, Transport Reviews. 26, p:613-643. Transport Reviews.
  • Gibbons, S.Machin, S. (2005) Valuing rail access using transport innovations, Journal of Urban Economics. 57, p:148-169. Journal of Urban Economics.
  • Hau, T. D. K. (1988) The demand for public transport in Hong Kong. Hong Kong:Centre of Urban Studies & Urban Planning, University of Hong Kong. The demand for public transport in Hong Kong.
  • Henneberry, J. (1998) Transport investment and house prices, Journal of Property Valuation and Investment. 16, –.p:144-158. Journal of Property Valuation and Investment.
  • Jun, M. J. (2012) Redistributive effects of bus rapid transit (BRT) on development patterns and property values in Seoul, Korea, Transport Policy. 19, –.p:85-92. Transport Policy.
  • Meakin, R. T. (1994) Prospects for city and suburban public transport, Moving away from the motor vehicle. Hong Kong: In (Ed.), (pp. –).p:103-118. The German and Hong Kong Experience. The Centre of Urban Planning and Environmental Management, The University of Hong Kong. Moving away from the motor vehicle.
  • Munoz-Raskin, R. (2010) Walking accessibility to bus rapid transit: Does it affect property values? The case of Bogotá, Colombia, Transport Policy. 17, –.p:72-84. Transport Policy.
  • Rodrigues, D. A.Targa, F. (2004) Value of accessibility to Bogota’s bus rapid transit system, Transport Reviews. 24, p:587-610. Transport Reviews.
  • Rodríguez, D. A.Mojica, C. H. (2009) Capitalization of BRT network expansions effects into prices of non-expansion areas, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 43, p:560-571. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
  • Rosen, S. (1974) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition, Journal of Political Economy. 82, –.p:34-55. Journal of Political Economy.
  • So, H. M.Tse, R. Y.Ganesan, S. (1997) Estimating the influence of transport on house prices: Evidence from Hong Kong, Journal of Property Valuation and Investment. 15, p:40-47. Journal of Property Valuation and Investment.
  • Transmilenio, S. A. (2007) . Retrieved from www.transmilenio.gov.co/
  • Ubbels, B.Nijkamp, P. (2002) Unconventional funding of urban public transport, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 7, p:317-329. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.
  • Wrigley, M.Wyatt, P.Lane, C. (2001) Transport policy and property values, In RICS Cutting Edge Conference. 5, p:7. In RICS Cutting Edge Conference.
  • Zamparini, L.Reggiani, A. (2007) Meta-analysis and the value of travel time savings: A transatlantic perspective in passenger transport, Networks and Spatial Economics. 7, p:377-396. Networks and Spatial Economics.